Advanced Skin Care

Clinical dermatology and aesthetic treatments designed for healthy, radiant skin.

Modern Dental Care

Comfort-focused dentistry designed for healthy, confident and beautiful smiles.

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage & Quashes Pending Cases Under Article 142 | Matrimonial Law

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage & Quashes Pending Cases Under Article 142 | Matrimonial Law

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA | LANDMARK JUDGMENT

Supreme Court Ends Matrimonial Dispute & Quashes Pending Cases Using Article 142

Main Judgment

The Supreme Court dissolved the marriage between the parties by mutual consent under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, after finding that the marriage had reached a dead end and there was no possibility of reconciliation.

The Court noted that the parties had agreed to part ways and that the husband had paid ₹35 lakh towards full and final settlement of the wife’s claims as permanent alimony. The Supreme Court thereafter quashed the pending civil and criminal proceedings filed inter se between the parties and their family members, as covered by the order.

The Court also directed the parties not to file any fresh cases against each other.

Key Facts

  • Parties: Shikha w/o Varun Surekha @ Shikha d/o Sharadkumar Raniwala v. State of Odisha & Others.
  • Marriage: The parties were married on 04.12.2016 at Cuttack, Odisha.
  • Separation: The parties had been living separately since 2022 due to irreconcilable differences.
  • Multiple Proceedings: Numerous civil and criminal proceedings were pending between the spouses and their family members across different forums.
  • Permanent Alimony: The husband agreed to pay ₹35 lakh towards full and final settlement of the wife’s claims. The Court recorded that ₹2 lakh had been paid immediately and the balance ₹33 lakh was handed over through demand drafts.
  • Final Resolution: The Supreme Court dissolved the marriage and quashed the pending cases between the parties covered by its order.

Why It Matters

Important Development in Matrimonial Litigation: The Supreme Court can exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution to do “complete justice” in appropriate matrimonial cases.

Where the facts demonstrate that the marriage has irretrievably broken down, the parties have mutually agreed to separate, and the settlement is genuine and addresses relevant issues such as alimony and pending litigation, the Supreme Court may exercise its Article 142 jurisdiction to dissolve the marriage and provide consequential reliefs.

Quashing of Connected Proceedings: In the present case, the Supreme Court quashed the pending civil and criminal cases filed inter se between the parties and their family members, and directed the parties not to institute fresh cases against each other.

Important: Article 142 does not mean that every matrimonial dispute can automatically be dissolved by the Supreme Court. The Court itself emphasised that the existence of the power and its exercise in a particular case are different questions. The discretion depends upon the factual circumstances and objective considerations of the individual case.

Case Title, Citation, Date & Bench

Case Name: Shikha w/o Varun Surekha @ Shikha d/o Sharadkumar Raniwala v. State of Odisha & Others

Citation: 2026 INSC 1060

Case No.: Transfer Petition (Criminal) No. 493 of 2025, along with Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 2564 of 2025

Judgment Date: 28 September 2026

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: Justice B.V. Nagarathna & Justice R. Mahadevan

Key Legal Principle

The Supreme Court relied upon and followed the principles laid down in:

Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan (2023)

The judgment recognised the Supreme Court’s power under Article 142(1) to do complete justice in appropriate matrimonial matters and to deal with connected proceedings in accordance with the settlement between the parties.

Rinku Baheti v. Sandesh Sharda

The Supreme Court subsequently applied the Article 142 principles in an appropriate matrimonial dispute involving irretrievable breakdown of marriage.

Key Legal Takeaway

The judgment demonstrates how Article 142 of the Constitution of India may be exercised by the Supreme Court in an appropriate matrimonial dispute to bring comprehensive finality to the litigation, including dissolution of marriage and consequential treatment of connected civil and criminal proceedings.

For legal advice relating to divorce, mutual consent divorce, matrimonial disputes, permanent alimony, quashing of criminal cases and matrimonial litigation, consult Adv. Keshav Mehra Advocate in Gurgaon experienced in family and matrimonial law.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit lawyers and law firms from soliciting work and advertising. By proceeding further and clicking on the “I AGREE” button herein below, I hereby acknowledge that I, of my own accord, intend to know more and subsequently acquire more information about Chambers of Keshav Mehra for my own purpose and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no advertisement, solicitation, communication, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from Chambers of Keshav Mehra or any of its members to create or solicit an attorney-client relationship through this website. I further acknowledge having read and understood and perused through the content of the DISCLAIMER mentioned below and the Privacy Policy.

DISCLAIMER

This website (advocateingurgaon.com) is a resource for informational purposes only and is intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct and complete. Chambers of Keshav Mehra does not warrant that the information contained on this website is accurate or complete, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause. Any information obtained or downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and their own discretion and any further transmission, receipt or use of this website would not create any attorney-client relationship. The contents of this website do not constitute, and shall not be construed as, legal advice or a substitute for legal advice. All material and information (except any statutory enactments and/or judicial precedents) on this website is the property of Chambers of Keshav Mehra and no part thereof shall be used, without the express prior written consent of Chambers of Keshav Mehra.